Compare Informatica MDM vs. Semarchy xDM

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Informatica MDM Logo
11,346 views|8,161 comparisons
Semarchy xDM Logo
1,654 views|1,067 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, SAP and others in Master Data Management. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"We've used the solution for quite some time, so in our organization, the product is pretty mature.""It has flexibility in extending the data model.""The data quality component is very good.""I like the number of options that are presented with Informatica, fuzzy matching, and your screen.""MDM doesn't require a separate IDQ.""Its data cleansing capabilities are very valuable. The match and merge and the audit trail functionalities are very good."

More Informatica MDM Pros »

"Their documentation is excellent."

More Semarchy xDM Pros »

"The integration could be a bit better. The process is something new.""The advertising makes promises about data analytics that it does not keep.""Pre-sales technical support is much better than post-sales technical support.""They have too many diversified products. If you don't know Informatica, it's very confusing and feels very idiotic.""The solution doesn't directly connect to any of the analytical tools.""Their support should be improved. We have had some trouble with their support from time to time. Its scalability should also be improved. I would also like to have a bit more modern and friendly UI for the end-users. There should definitely be a simplified way to configure and set it up."

More Informatica MDM Cons »

"They need to make the workflow more enhanced or dynamic in its functionality."

More Semarchy xDM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high."

More Informatica MDM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  MDM doesn't require a separate IDQ.
Top Answer: It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high.
Top Answer: I'd like the ability to directly connect from MDM to any of the analytical tools. It's a feature that would be very helpful for analytical reporting. When you connect to the cloud, there are… more »
Top Answer: Their documentation is excellent.
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is excellent. It costs less than Informatica and Profisee.
Top Answer: They need to make the workflow more enhanced or dynamic in its functionality. That was the tiebreaker between Profisee and Semarchy - the client had a SQL server development environment and they could… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Siperian, Customer 360
Semarchy Intelligent MDM
Learn More

Informatica MDM solution delivers the market-leading foundation on which to build that trusted 360-degree view. Companies around the globe rely on Informatica MDM to give business users easy access to the data that drives their strategic decisions about cutting costs, increasing revenues, improving operations, reducing risk, and capitalizing on opportunities. As the industry’s only true end-to-end MDM solution, it incorporates data integration, data quality, data governance, business process management, and master data management on a single vendor-agnostic platform to ensure faster time-to-value.

Semarchy is the Intelligent MDM company. Its xDM platform is an innovation in multi-vector Master Data Management (MDM) that leverages smart algorithms and material design to simplify data stewardship, governance, and integration. It is implemented via an agile and iterative approach that delivers business value almost immediately and scales to meet enterprise complexity.

Learn more about Informatica MDM
Learn more about Semarchy xDM
Sample Customers
UPMC, Citrix
DiamondStream, Oakley, Araymond, EBU/Eurovision, Groupe Roullier, BOSE, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Putnam Investments, BAE Systems, Mundi Pharma, Merck, Elsevier, CMA CGM
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Insurance Company8%
Wellness & Fitness Company8%
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, SAP and others in Master Data Management. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Master Data Management with 5 reviews while Semarchy xDM is ranked 10th in Master Data Management with 1 review. Informatica MDM is rated 8.0, while Semarchy xDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Good use cases and end-to-end features but needs more setup documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Semarchy xDM writes "Great user interface, very good documentation, and offers excellent pricing". Informatica MDM is most compared with IBM InfoSphere MDM, Informatica PIM, Microsoft MDS, SAP Master Data Governance and Oracle Product Master Data Management Cloud, whereas Semarchy xDM is most compared with Microsoft MDS, Profisee, Reltio Cloud, Informatica PIM and SAP Master Data Governance.

See our list of best Master Data Management vendors and best Cloud Master Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.