Compare Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs. Oracle Advanced Security
Use Informatica Persistent Data Masking? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs. Oracle Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is data discovery. This is the most exciting feature for all of the banks."
"The most valuable features are the structure masking and platform masking."
"The features that are the most used by the customers and partners are, at the moment, for GDPR, so obviously data encryption and data reduction. Our customers also like the partitioning option."
"The most valuable feature is the data encryption option for columns and tables."
Cons
"I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking."
"The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud."
"It is really constrained as an environment because you cannot change something that would be useful. It is a very good product because it is very similar to what you have on-premises. Yes, it is constrained, but it is expected because it is a platform as a service so it has to be constrained."
"Having a single command to encrypt a table would be an improvement."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the data encryption option for columns and tables.
Top Answer: Pricing is pretty similar between the competitors because you have to spend more money on a computer for AWS and less money for Oracle but the storage is a bit cheaper. I think that prices are very… more »
Top Answer: Encrypting a single column is straightforward, but encrypting at the table level requires more work and takes longer to complete. Having a single command to encrypt a table would be an improvement.
Views
1,590
Comparisons
1,151
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
413
Rating
8.0
Views
228
Comparisons
183
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
461
Rating
8.0
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.
Oracle Advanced Security provides data encryption and strong authentication services to the Oracle database, safeguarding sensitive data against unauthorized access from the network and the operating system. It also protects against theft, loss, and improper decommissioning of storage media and database backups.
Learn more about Informatica Persistent Data Masking
Learn more about Oracle Advanced Security
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish water, trueblue, AirAsia
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company9%
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs. Oracle Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 4th in Data Masking with 2 reviews while Oracle Advanced Security is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 2 reviews. Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 8.0, while Oracle Advanced Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Data transformation and test management features allow us to work with unstructured data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Advanced Security writes "Has good data encryption and data reduction but the solution is constrained ". Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Protegrity Data Security, IBM Guardium Data Protection, Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, whereas Oracle Advanced Security is most compared with IBM Guardium Data Protection, Microsoft BitLocker and Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise. See our Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs. Oracle Advanced Security report.
See our list of best Data Masking vendors.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.