Fortra's Vera vs Informatica Persistent Data Masking comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortra Logo
74 views|45 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Informatica Logo
303 views|179 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortra's Vera and Informatica Persistent Data Masking based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Brando Diego
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Vera encryption is the most valuable feature."

More Fortra's Vera Pros →

"Informatica provides a comprehensive solution for on-the-fly or real-time data masking.""Informatica is user-friendly, stable, and scalable. These three aspects are the most valuable for us. If we can make it work well with the CRM, we can continue or try again this year to complete that part of the project. I am confident that this kind of solution is what we need because we have a third-party resource that works in the development.""The most valuable features are the structure masking and platform masking.""Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.""The most valuable feature is data discovery. This is the most exciting feature for all of the banks."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Pros →

Cons
"The additional improvement can be done as the issues are encountered.""Additional improvement can be done as the issues are encountered."

More Fortra's Vera Cons →

"Informatica's support understands the solution, but they lack the experience we need for our use case. That was one thing that we prioritized when we started searching for this kind of solution.""Informatica should simplify the rules for setting classifications and user access management permissions. It's too complex to define, configure, and make work.""Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value.""I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking.""The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Vera encryption is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer:Additional improvement can be done as the issues are encountered.
Top Answer:Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Ranking
11th
out of 22 in Database Security
Views
74
Comparisons
45
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
114
Rating
9.0
6th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
303
Comparisons
179
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
544
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
Learn More
Overview

The Vera platform enables businesses of all sizes to protect any kind of data, and then track, audit and manage the policies securing files in real-time, no matter how far they travel.

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

Sample Customers
Box
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company13%
Government7%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Database Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortra's Vera is ranked 11th in Database Security with 1 review while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 5 reviews. Fortra's Vera is rated 9.0, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortra's Vera writes "Has good encryption features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". Fortra's Vera is most compared with , whereas Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.

We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.