We performed a comparison between Informatica PowerCenter and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support is great. It's one of the reasons we really like them. When you compare support from IBM and support from Informatica, Informatica is much better."
"The solution is stable."
"The partitioning and optimization to help enhance our development is a very valuable aspect of Informatica PowerCenter."
"The most valuable aspects of Informatica PowerCenter are the many features, ease of use, and user-friendliness."
"Good interface, reasonable documentation."
"I would recommend that others considering the solution go ahead and use it for any batch and high volume loads with complex transactions."
"Once you have learned Informatica, it is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the new Data Lake feature, which provides the basic capabilities needed."
"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve by having a single interface because half of the system is still in the legacy interface and many other elements are moved to the developer client. It would be good if there was a single interface for the end user and developers."
"I would like to see an improvement in the digital adoption."
"There is some room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"Integration with Artificial Intelligence would benefit this solution."
"The solution could have better documentation on basic steps or blocks that specify what to do."
"Lacks ability to calculate cost of the product."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve the data threshold for large sets of data. Additionally, they should add real-time integration."
"This product is going to decommission in the next couple of years."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The technical support must be improved."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Informatica PowerCenter vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.