Compare Informatica PowerCenter vs. Quest SharePlex

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica PowerCenter vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Technical support is great. It's one of the reasons we really like them. When you compare support from IBM and support from Informatica, Informatica is much better.""The performance and design of Informatica have been very valuable. I find the performance faster than, say, Oracle Data Integrator or DataStage.""In the end, you have structured, proper data for use in an integrated BI solution.""The features I find most valuable is that the solution is very user-friendly and the graphical design is very easy to understand.""Technical support, and their approach is good. They have a support portal and support tickets. If you open a ticket it has multiple levels of severity from level one to very high or critical.""The most complex task, in this case, was to read and transform BLOB data, and Java transformation in Informatica Power Center was a great solution.""The most valuable feature is the new Data Lake feature, which provides the basic capabilities needed.""The partitioning and optimization to help enhance our development is a very valuable aspect of Informatica PowerCenter."

More Informatica PowerCenter Pros »

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent.""There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target.""Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

More Quest SharePlex Pros »

Cons
"Now they are migrating to a new version, and they have something that is called Informatica Developer. Previously, they just had PowerCenter. Now, when they move everything to Informatica Developer it's not as good or stable like it was when it was PowerCenter, though it has some nice features. This Developer tool could be better.""As a connector to big data, it is not well developed. We've had problems connecting Informatica with Hadoop. The functionality to connect Informatica with Hadoop, for me it's not good.""Integration with Artificial Intelligence would benefit this solution.""I would like to see an improvement in the digital adoption.""The licensing cost for Informatica is very high. Other all-in-one solutions have much lower prices than Informatica.""Include more instruments for LOGs analysis, interpretation, and job corrections.""I found it is kind of weird that not all of the mapping changes are treated as true changes.""The multiple interfaces in Informatica PowerCenter are not great for the user experience. Because of this, I think it can cause confusion for any beginner developer."

More Informatica PowerCenter Cons »

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication.""I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training.""I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

More Quest SharePlex Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Price-wise, it's more expensive than SSIS, but it's a better tool, so it has more features. Licensing is on a yearly basis.""Its maintenance is expensive.""It's much more expensive, almost three times more expensive than most other solutions.""We are satisfied with the pricing.""I consider this to be an expensive product.""It is for big enterprises. We have leveraged Informatica for big enterprises but not for small and medium enterprises because it is a very costly product as compared to other products. We propose this solution only for enterprise customers. For small to medium enterprises, we would propose the Microsoft solution. Its licensing is currently bundle-wise. It should be features-wise and not bundle-wise.""The price of this solution is high.""Our client has purchased the license, and we are using it."

More Informatica PowerCenter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets.""It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

More Quest SharePlex Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are the monitoring tools and the reporting manager.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is high. With an interval of every couple of years, they upgrade to a new version and stop supporting the previous versions. At this point, you need to acquire a new… more »
Top Answer: Integrating new tools can be tricky and challenging.
Top Answer: There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync… more »
Top Answer: I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want… more »
Top Answer: We use Quest SharePlex for a specific reason. We are migrating from on-premise to cloud. SharePlex is a replication service. We are using it to do the migration of our databases to AWS Cloud. Once… more »
Ranking
1st
Views
39,398
Comparisons
31,957
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
8.2
17th
Views
3,201
Comparisons
1,955
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
1,239
Rating
9.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PowerCenter
Dell SharePlex, SharePlex
Learn More
Overview

Enterprise data integration platform to help organizations access, transform, and integrate data from a variety of systems.

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Offer
Learn more about Informatica PowerCenter
Learn more about Quest SharePlex
Sample Customers
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, LexisNexis, Rabobank
Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm15%
Retailer11%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government8%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise60%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica PowerCenter vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 1st in Data Integration Tools with 22 reviews while Quest SharePlex is ranked 17th in Data Integration Tools with 3 reviews. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.2, while Quest SharePlex is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "A stable, scalable, and mature solution for complex transformations and data integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest SharePlex writes "Real-time replication means our data is available almost instantaneously if an issue occurs in one of our data centers". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS, Azure Data Factory, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and Informatica PowerExchange, whereas Quest SharePlex is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, Qlik Replicate, HVR Software, AWS Database Migration Service and SSIS. See our Informatica PowerCenter vs. Quest SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.