Compare Informatica PowerCenter vs. webMethods Integration Server
Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 2nd in Data Integration Tools with 5 reviews while webMethods Integration Server which is ranked 5th in Business Process Management with 19 reviews. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Works with any multi-database, reduces legacy coding, and is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Informatica, Microsoft and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: June 2019. 353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The most valuable features are the dynamic reading of the file metadata profile, and the ability to define business rules that are used to verify and validate the uploaded files. Informatica PowerCenter has been implementing mapping design, data flow, and workflow execution for years. It reduces a lot of legacy coding. It works with any multi-databases, so it works with Sybase, SQL Server. Also, the performance is really good and it is easy to use. Reusable definition of data sources and the out-of-the-box availability of a large number maplets for common transformation functions. Easy, scalable, robust platform to integrate heterogeneous source platform's data into the unified data warehouse. UI-based ability to create data mapping. Good product if you are trying implement data quality, data integration, and data management projects. | A product with good API and EDI components. We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting. It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine). We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces. The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging. The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.) Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed. I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well. |
Cons | |
The developer tool documentation can be enhanced with a more clear explanation of each utility, accompanied by relevant examples, so that developers are able to create programs with ease. Integrated Reporting service should be more smoothly transitioned from view to function to be in sync with the main design. The initial setup is not straightforward. You need expertise to do it. While Informatica is great for data-integration, it does not have any analytics features. Thus, organizations have to always look for another product for their BI needs. There can be scalability issues. Huge amounts of data ingestion will impact performance. We had stability issues, mostly with JVM size. | The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly. We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics. t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData. We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable. Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion. When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods. The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that. The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Licensing is a one time cost. But maintenance costs depend on what you want, how long you need it. Maintenance is a kind of insurance. With health insurance, you don't know whether you will get sick or need to go to hospital or not but you have to have insurance. It's the same thing with support. If you have that expertise in resolving issues, if you have enough experience in your IT department, I would say you don't need the support. But in practice, they recommend you go with the support. If you want support you have to pay for it. Cost could be improved. | It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one. Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers. Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client. Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials. It is worth the cost. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs. 353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 52,348 Comparisons 27,070 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 218 Avg. Rating 7.8 | Views 25,208 Comparisons 10,395 Reviews 20 Average Words per Review 301 Avg. Rating 8.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. |  Compared 35% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| PowerCenter | |
Learn | |
| Informatica | Software AG |
Overview | |
Enterprise data integration platform to help organizations access, transform, and integrate data from a variety of systems. | The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Informatica PowerCenter | Learn more about webMethods Integration Server |
Sample Customers | |
| University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, LexisNexis, Rabobank | Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt |
Top Industries | |
Healthcare Company20% Financial Services Firm20% Hospitality Company10% Government10% Financial Services Firm39% Healthcare Company7% University5% Comms Service Provider5% | Energy/Utilities Company33% Comms Service Provider11% Pharma/Biotech Company11% Maritime Company11% Energy/Utilities Company20% Financial Services Firm14% Retailer9% Insurance Company8% |
Company Size | |
Small Business6% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise78% Small Business19% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise66% | Small Business9% Large Enterprise91% Small Business10% Large Enterprise90% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Informatica, Microsoft and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: June 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Informatica PowerCenter Reviews, webMethods Integration Server Reviews, and our list of Best Data Integration Tools Companies.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.