Informatica Supplier 360 vs inRiver comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Informatica Logo
94 views|53 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
InRiver Logo
58 views|53 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Supplier 360 and inRiver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Master Data Management (MDM) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Paul Stoneman
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are quite happy with the licensing model."
  • More Informatica Supplier 360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's got a reputation in the industry as one of the best solutions for master data management. So, it's what we see in the Gartner top right quadrant as the best product in that space.
    Top Answer:The licensing model allows you to consume a reasonable amount of products and is not constrained to specific parts items. So we can bring on other components of the solution without needing new… more »
    Top Answer:We'd like to see the microservices, which don't run yet because the solution is not yet fully cloud-based.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    94
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    58
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    This master-data fueled application lets supply chain, sourcing, and buying teams streamline their vendor and supplier information management based on one single, trusted source of business-critical data for analytics and operations.

    The original Product Experience Management platform. Provide perfect product information and speed time to market.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Intersport Sverige AB, Krusell International AB, Office Depot, Worth, ITW, Mayline Company LLC, Power Products LLC, SAIL, BMW Group, Beijer Electronics, Consortio Fashion Group, Draka Kabel Sverige
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Pharma/Biotech Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Master Data Management (MDM) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Informatica Supplier 360 is ranked 12th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 1 review while inRiver is ranked 1st in Product Information Management (PIM). Informatica Supplier 360 is rated 8.0, while inRiver is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Supplier 360 writes "A Reasonable Number of Products with No Restrictions on Specific Parts ". On the other hand, Informatica Supplier 360 is most compared with Informatica MDM and Informatica PIM, whereas inRiver is most compared with SAP Hybris PCM, Informatica PIM and Stibo STEP MDM.

    We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.