SAP Master Data Governance vs inRiver comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The cost of the product is not ideal."
  • "The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."
  • "We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price."
  • "The licensing cost is reasonable."
  • "The solution is costly."
  • "The product is too expensive."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
  • "SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
  • More SAP Master Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Information Management (PIM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective.
    Ranking
    Views
    59
    Comparisons
    54
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,404
    Comparisons
    1,515
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    347
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP MDG
    Learn More
    Overview

    The original Product Experience Management platform. Provide perfect product information and speed time to market.

    Your company wants accurate, complete, and trusted supplier data to master your digital business processes and business models. The SAPĀ® Master Data Governance application simplifies the integration of supplier data residing in both SAP and third-party sources. It supports cleansing, standardization, duplicate detection, and best-record calculation. It then lets you synchronize clean and standardized data across cloud and on-premise applications.

    Sample Customers
    Intersport Sverige AB, Krusell International AB, Office Depot, Worth, ITW, Mayline Company LLC, Power Products LLC, SAIL, BMW Group, Beijer Electronics, Consortio Fashion Group, Draka Kabel Sverige
    Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Wholesaler/Distributor25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Non Tech Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Retailer8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%

    inRiver is ranked 1st in Product Information Management (PIM) while SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 21 reviews. inRiver is rated 0.0, while SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". inRiver is most compared with SAP Hybris PCM, Informatica PIM and Stibo STEP MDM, whereas SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, TIBCO EBX, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud and IBM InfoSphere MDM.

    We monitor all Product Information Management (PIM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.