Instart Web Security [EOL] vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Instart Web Security [EOL] and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Ranking
Unranked
In Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
537
Comparisons
250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
Akamai
Video Not Available
Overview

Instart Web Security is designed to secure your web apps from the dangers of the public web. All entry points into your application servers, whether it be your website, your APIs, or your web apps can be protected and secured with Instart Web Security. Instart provides protection across the entire traffic path for your application — from inside the browser where customers and attackers interact with your site, to the edge, all the way to your cloud or physical application infrastructure. The result is end-to-end protection for your web apps that is capable of preventing even the most sophisticated attack from taking down your site or gaining access to sensitive data.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Government10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Instart Web Security [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Instart Web Security [EOL] is rated 0.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Instart Web Security [EOL] is most compared with , whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.