Compare InstaSafe Secure Access vs. SAIFE Continuum

InstaSafe Secure Access is ranked 11th in ZTNA as a Service while SAIFE Continuum is ranked 12th in ZTNA as a Service. InstaSafe Secure Access is rated 0, while SAIFE Continuum is rated 0. On the other hand, InstaSafe Secure Access is most compared with , whereas SAIFE Continuum is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
11th
out of 12 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
29
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
12th
out of 12 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
8
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Learn
InstaSafe
SAIFE
Overview

InstaSafe® Secure Access solution provides an identity based granular access control solution based on the principles of Software Defined Perimeter (SDP). SDP concepts have been derived from the military, especially the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), where every device is pre-attested before it can ‘connect’ to the network followed by verification of the identity of the user using MFA leading to knowing exactly what device was being used and by whom to access the application.

With the device & user’s knowledge, ISA is able to ensure that the device and the user are able to only ‘see’ and ‘access’ the data, that they have ‘prior approval’ to see or access – the ‘need-to-know’ access model.

Continuum provides secure and trusted routing for any endpoint, across virtually any type of network, regardless of infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about InstaSafe Secure Access
Learn more about SAIFE Continuum
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.