• Home
  • Intel MFSYS25 vs. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Intel MFSYS25 vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intel Logo

Intel MFSYS25

Read 2 Intel MFSYS25 reviews
52 views|30 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Intel MFSYS25 and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We're able to set-up multiple VLANs in it.
We have improved a lot, and our customers are very satisfied with the product. We're able to set-up multiple VLANs in it. I think that Intel... Read more →
Anonymous User
Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment
Ranking
21st
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
52
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
MFSYS25
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Learn More
Intel
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Overview

This Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25/MFSYS35 platform supports up to six compute modules, up to fourteen hot-swap 2.5-inch SAS hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25, or up to six hot-swap 3.5-inch SAS/SATA hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS35, an integrated server management module, redundant Ethernet switches, and redundant storage controllers. The server ships configured for rack mounting, but may be mounted in a pedestal configuration. 

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.
Sample Customers
Eisenhower & Carlson, PLLC
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Intel MFSYS25 is ranked 21st in Blade Servers while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Intel MFSYS25 is rated 6.0, while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Intel MFSYS25 writes " We're able to set-up multiple VLANs in it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". Intel MFSYS25 is most compared with , whereas Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.