Intellect BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intellect Logo
148 views|116 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
991 views|783 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Intellect BPM and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Intellect BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and make it seamless, similar to Teams.
    Ranking
    Views
    148
    Comparisons
    116
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    783
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    Learn More
    Overview

    Intellect is a leading provider of Cloud BPM software built for a mobile world, with an award winning rules-based workflow capability. Intellect is focused on delivering the fastest ROI in the industry, and delivers exceptional results for mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises seeking fast time-to-value. The Intellect 8 BPM Platform empowers users to create and manage enterprise apps that include advanced workflow, smart forms, custom reports, and integration capabilities. Click here to learn more: http://hubs.ly/H01Q1R90

    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
    Sample Customers
    300+ customers including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, American Specialty Health, Baker Corp, Bayview Loan Servicing, Circle K, CoreMedica Laboratories, Dunn-Edwards Paints, DynaCare, Edwards Technologies, Emerson Climate Technologies, Enviva, Georgetown University, HGL, Host Hotels & Resorts, Hubbell, Humboldt County, Jacobs, Northgate Markets, Parkways Schools, Princess Cruises, Silliker, Stryker, ThermoFisher Scientific, Wind River, a division of Intel.
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise20%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Intellect BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Intellect BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Intellect BPM is ranked 57th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Intellect BPM is rated 8.6, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Intellect BPM writes "It allows for business process data to be captured in a way that's usable and structured for not just business process automation, but business process improvement and optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Intellect BPM is most compared with , whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda. See our Intellect BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.