Intellinx [EOL] vs RSA Web Threat Detection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Intellinx [EOL] and RSA Web Threat Detection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Views
257
Comparisons
188
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Bottomline Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Intellinx offers a wide range of anti-fraud, forensics, compliance and Enterprise Case Management solutions on a single platform. Intellinx’s patented technology features unparalleled visibility into internal and external user activity, supporting advanced user behavior profiling and transaction analysis.

Enterprises worldwide enjoy Intellinx’s exceptional flexibility and ease of use, enabling them to quickly respond to the ever-changing threat landscape, with minimal IT assistance. The system’s cross channel analytics allows for effective prevention of sophisticated fraud schemes perpetrated by trusted employees, external fraudsters and collaborations.

RSA Web Threat Detection is a fraud detection platform that helps organizations identify anomalous online behavior with real time data visibility & analysis and respond on the fly to even the most sophisticated (and newest) fraud - without discouraging legitimate users from using your site. WTD's Behavioral Intelligence drives a feedback loop that continuously improves threat detection capabilities. It addresses variety of fraud types ranging from account takeover, DDoS attack and bots to wire transfer, credit card, 'Pump and dump' stock trades, Mobile and web session hijacking, Fraudulent account creation and money movement and random deposit fraud.

Sample Customers
LaSer UK, Delaware Criminal Justice Information System, Equifax, Bank Leumi, REJIS Commission
ADP, Shop Direct, Landsbankinn
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm44%
Wholesaler/Distributor7%
Educational Organization6%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise79%
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Intellinx [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention while RSA Web Threat Detection is ranked 26th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Intellinx [EOL] is rated 0.0, while RSA Web Threat Detection is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Intellinx [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA Web Threat Detection is most compared with Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS).

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.