InterSystems Caché vs Progress OpenEdge RDBMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
InterSystems Logo
152 views|66 comparisons
Progress Software Logo
865 views|298 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between InterSystems Caché and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Firebird and others in Embedded Database.
To learn more, read our detailed Embedded Database Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use InterSystems Caché?
Anonymous User
Ranking
10th
out of 14 in Embedded Database
Views
152
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 14 in Embedded Database
Views
865
Comparisons
298
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Embedded Database
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Firebird and others in Embedded Database. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
InterSystems Cache
OpenEdge RDBMS, Progress RDBMS, Progress OpenEdge, OpenEdge
Learn More
Overview
Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
The Progress OpenEdge Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) is an established, database management system for production systems. The OpenEdge database can support thousands of users and high traffic loads with sub-second response times. It helps to ensure that users are productive, customers are satisfied, and, for SaaS/Cloud computing environments, service-level agreements are met. Some of the key benefits of OpenEdge RDBMS include cost-effectiveness, raises productivity, easy to administer, scalable, and easy to manage. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS has a large shared-memory buffer pool allows up to a terabyte of the database to be cached in memory in a 64-bit OS environment. This gives memory-speed access to the frequently used parts of the database for best performance. In addition, its storage or space management is extendable: architected for expansion and optimized for performance. As a result, OpenEdge RDBMS presents virtually no limitations to the amount of data that can be stored in a single database other than the storage limits of your own computing environment.
Sample Customers
CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
Apero Solutions, Heath Village, International Energy Services, Exact Software, PepsiCo Russia, Pero, SVK, FreshERP
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization67%
Healthcare Company15%
Computer Software Company7%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Government8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise66%
Large Enterprise28%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise54%
Buyer's Guide
Embedded Database
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Firebird and others in Embedded Database. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

InterSystems Caché is ranked 10th in Embedded Database while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is ranked 5th in Embedded Database. InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0, while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Progress OpenEdge RDBMS writes "Customizable, intelligent, and reacts in real-time". InterSystems Caché is most compared with , whereas Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory and SAP HANA.

See our list of best Embedded Database vendors.

We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.