We performed a comparison between IntSights and LogRhythm SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."It's great at alerting users to attempts at phishing and suspicious domains."
"It allows us to automate a lot of things with a smaller team."
"It gives us insight into our entire installation, where we are multiple sites, going as far as the East Coast to the Central West Coast."
"AXON has the ability to add and compare use cases."
"The most valuable features would be the automation, reporting, and the support."
"We have seen a massive increase in the amount of data that we can collect, the type of things that we can see, the way we can look at logs, the way we can get alerts, and the way can create our own customer roles, which has allowed us to customize the work in our environment."
"Our clients enjoy having one dashboard to monitor their environments in real time."
"Currently, we are in the implementation phase. LogRhythm is better than QRadar from the point of view of collecting Windows events. It has a much higher view. You can enable monitoring by default."
"The log analysis feature is valuable."
"The solution still has a lot of false positives."
"For our market, the solution is quite expensive. It would be ideal if they could work on and improve their existing pricing plans to help make it more affordable in our country."
"One of the challenges of the SIEM for the LogRhythm 7 platform is the amount of time it takes to bring new log sources into the MDI."
"The initial setup is complex. We are using a LogRhythm partner, at least for the first three years, to help with the monitoring and the deployment of it. We are not a big enough environment where we have people that we can dedicate to it right now."
"LogRhythm NextGen SIEM could improve by adding more applications for the banking sector. There are not any custom applications at this time."
"It will definitely help if the parsing side would be much easier, meaning it would be better if we could easily make adjustments on the parser, both on standard and non-standard log sources."
"More detail in the alerts given to avoid additional searches, as often the source or destination associated with the alert is not evidenced."
"We're still struggling to get a real return on it and finding something that isn't false noise."
"My biggest issue - I know that they say they're doing it - is that the API-building is extremely important. They keep saying it's coming, it's coming. It's not coming fast enough. I don't care if they need to double their team size to get it out there quicker, the world is already in the cloud and we can't monitor it. That's a big problem for us. My boss keeps coming to me about it. That's an issue."
Earn 20 points
IntSights is ranked 22nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms while LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 6th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 166 reviews. IntSights is rated 9.0, while LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IntSights writes "Great at showcasing vulnerabilities, excellent at providing alerts, and offers very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". IntSights is most compared with CyberInt Argos, CloudSEK XVigil, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage and Flashpoint Intelligence Platform, whereas LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and Fortinet FortiSIEM.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.