We performed a comparison between IntSights and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."It's great at alerting users to attempts at phishing and suspicious domains."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"The solution still has a lot of false positives."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
IntSights is ranked 22nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms while ThreatQ is ranked 16th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. IntSights is rated 9.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IntSights writes "Great at showcasing vulnerabilities, excellent at providing alerts, and offers very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". IntSights is most compared with CyberInt Argos, CloudSEK XVigil, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage and Flashpoint Intelligence Platform, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
