We performed a comparison between Inuvika and Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization.More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Inuvika is ranked 7th in Application Virtualization while Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is ranked 5th in Application Virtualization with 24 reviews. Inuvika is rated 10.0, while Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Inuvika writes "Our need to virtualise Linux applications alongside Windows made the search pretty limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) writes "Provides good scalability and a secure environment". Inuvika is most compared with Citrix Workspace, Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and VMware ThinApp, whereas Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service), Citrix Workspace, VMware Workstation and Parallels Desktop.
See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors and best Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) vendors.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.