Ipanema IpIengine vs Steelhead comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ipanema Technologies Logo
72 views|31 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Riverbed Logo
1,117 views|598 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ipanema IpIengine and Steelhead based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The solution is expensive and the service contacts are costly too. The cost of the device makes the value proposition borderline acceptable for us. The service contract fees we pay is approximately $30,000 annually."
  • More Steelhead Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We just did an assessment for our 47 datacenters around North America. The top two enterprise-level network monitoring solutions were ExtraHop first, Riverbed SteelCenter second. Their negotiated cost… more »
    Top Answer:The connectivity to speed is the valuable feature.
    Top Answer:The application response time of the solution can be improved.
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    1,117
    Comparisons
    598
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    232
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IpIengine
    RIverbed Steelhead
    Learn More
    Ipanema Technologies
    Video Not Available
    Riverbed
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

    Steelhead is the leading network optimization and application performance solution chosen by over 30,000 organizations worldwide. The performance of networks and applications directly impacts business productivity. Riverbed draws from nearly two decades of experience in driving network and application performance over Wide Area Networks with its flagship offering, SteelHead. SteelHead delivers the underlying technology that helps enterprises of all sizes maximize the efficiency and performance of the networks and applications used to run modern business. 

    SteelHead is proven to dramatically speed up the performance of applications anywhere in the organization while delivering the best end-user experience even under sub optimal network conditions. Reduce bandwidth utilization by up to 95%, deferring costly network bandwidth upgrades. Increase performance by up to 100x for on-premises applications.

    Sample Customers
    Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
    ElAraby, SFK Leblanc, Bobst Group, Northwest Pipe Company, Halkbank, Tradebridge, EFG Hermes
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Energy/Utilities Company19%
    Construction Company6%
    Media Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization while Steelhead is ranked 4th in WAN Optimization with 22 reviews. Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with , whereas Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP.

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.