Compare IPRO vs. LexisNexis Concordance Classic

IPRO is ranked 7th in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 9th in eDiscovery. IPRO is rated 0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0. On the other hand, IPRO is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, LAW PreDiscovery and kCura Relativity, whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with kCura Relativity, AccessData Group Summation and IPRO.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IPRO Logo
894 views|622 comparisons
LexisNexis Concordance Classic Logo
701 views|609 comparisons
Ranking
7th
out of 44 in eDiscovery
Views
894
Comparisons
622
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
9th
out of 44 in eDiscovery
Views
701
Comparisons
609
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
Concordance Classic
Learn
IPRO
Video Not Available
LexisNexis
Overview
Generate custom group insurance proposals from any computer via the internet.LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Offer
Learn more about IPRO
Learn more about LexisNexis Concordance Classic
Sample Customers
Polsinelli Shughart, doeLegal, Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog, ProSearch Strategies, Levi and Korsinsky LLP, Commonwealth Legal, Manning Curtis, Shephard Data Services, Keating Meuthing & Klekamp PLL, Berger Singerman, Porter Wright, Yarmuth WilsdonParalegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email