• Home
  • Iron.io vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

Iron.io vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Iron.io Logo

Iron.io

46 views|15 comparisons
Red Hat Logo

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

Read 1 Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS review
122 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Iron.io and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Iron.io?
Akran Ruiz
It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
Top Answer:JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.
What needs improvement with Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
Top Answer:JBoss could add more automation.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
Top Answer:We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.
Ranking
18th
out of 21 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
Views
46
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 21 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
Views
122
Comparisons
105
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
172
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
IronMQ
Learn More
Iron.io
Video Not Available
Red Hat
Overview

IronMQ is an elastic message queue created specifically with the cloud in mind. It’s easy to use, runs on industrial-strength cloud infrastructure, and offers developers ready-to-use messaging with highly reliable delivery options and cloud-optimized performance.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

Sample Customers
Zenefits, Google, Turner, Whole Foods Market, Thrillist, Harry's, Untappd, Twitter, Consyl, Edeva, Hotel Tonight
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Iron.io is ranked 18th in Message Queue (MQ) Software while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. Iron.io is rated 0.0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". Iron.io is most compared with , whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.