We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and OpenText Data Protector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."
"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."
"The initial setup was relatively easy."
"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."
"The reliability of HP Data Protector is the most valuable feature for us."
"It works excellently only with Oracle."
"The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."
"The graphical interface needs to be improved."
"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."
"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."
"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."
"Other tools seem to be easier to use."
"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."
"The technical support was very slow."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while OpenText Data Protector is ranked 23rd in Backup and Recovery with 99 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while OpenText Data Protector is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Data Protector writes "User-friendly, competitive, agent-based, and easy to manage". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication, whereas OpenText Data Protector is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup, HPE StoreOnce and Symantec Data Loss Prevention.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
