We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance."
"The most valuable feature of Rubrik for me is its user-friendliness and efficiency."
"The management and ease of installation are the most valuable features."
"Disk mount that lets a restore happen immediately, no need to re-hydrate."
"There is a live-restore feature, their Live Mount, and the way it works we can instantly recover a VM, a past backup, to be directly attached to our VMware environment. Rubrik will act as a disk for it. It's like an instant restore. Within a few minutes our VM is up and running. And then, if we want to restore it, we can just migrate it to our actual storage."
"I don't know if it is the best or the worst but it's very easy to install and very easy to balance. Sometimes that it's a problem because the installer of these data gets extremely scared because it's so easy. The product is easy to install, easy to balance, and easy to work with. Another really good point is the instant recovery."
"CloudOn allows for backed up virtual machines stored offsite in Azure to be instantiated as an Azure virtual machine and spun up."
"I value the options it has for storage tiering (i.e. whether it should be a flash, SSD, or pushed to the cloud) depending on the data provided."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"I would like to see more openness for partners to access and assist in system management. Currently, access is limited, often handled by Rubrik personnel, likely due to security concerns."
"The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly."
"Rubrik needs to continue to listen to their customers and what they want/need, not just care about money and the bottom line."
"I would like to see more information on encryption with the next release."
"Capacity reports could definitely be improved. It's hard to determine what is using the space and why. For instance, you can see that some host is using 2 TB on the Rubrik node and the disk space on that host is 400 GBs. It's hard to explain how there can be 2 TBs of data on local storage when nothing has changed on the host for the past three days."
"Rubrik could improve in customization options for dashboards."
"The reporting in the dashboard and reporting for extractions both need improvement. I would suggest making them easier to understand and use, not just out-of-the-box. We should also be able to customize them."
"The product’s user interface needs improvement."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 82 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain).
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.