We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Veritas Backup Exec based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The solution was stable and reliable."
"It is a good overall suite of products."
"The product is good in a small environment when looking to a backup on a tape."
"Veritas Backup Exec is easily managed."
"We have never had any problem with storage and backups. It works very well and is a user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable features of Veritas Backup Exec are the easy-to-use intuitive GUI. It is very easy to understand. I have never lost data and I have been able to recover all the data I need."
"The implementation is straightforward."
"The solution is very fast. It does not take a long time to backup everything."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"It could be improved in the area of reporting and ease-of-use."
"More stable environment in a WAN infrastructure."
"The integration with SaaS applications like Office 365 needs to be improved."
"Compared to other vendors, there are features that you will find not included in Veritas."
"Its scalability should be improved."
"It is currently missing the dynamic backup feature for virtual machines, which is available in NetWorker. I can create politics in NetWorker to add virtual machines with specific tags, but I cannot do this in Backup Exec, which is a minus point for me. Currently, a user has to send a request to the Backup administrator to add a machine to the backup, but I should be able to create rules to automatically add a new machine to the backup. This kind of functionality is very important in current times, especially when we are using cloud solutions. I should be able to create more than one stream in a policy and specify how many streams I want to run in parallel in one policy. Currently, I have to manually create more policies to backup more than one virtual machine at the same time. Their support can also be improved in terms of response time."
"It doesn't support the AIX platform."
"A web console would be great because nowadays a lot of products are web-based and you can access the console from various environments. So I would recommend bringing this feature in the next solution."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Veritas Backup Exec is ranked 15th in Backup and Recovery with 71 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Veritas Backup Exec is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas Backup Exec writes "Highly stable, intuitive design, and integrates well". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication, whereas Veritas Backup Exec is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Veritas System Recovery.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.