IronNet Collective Defense Platform vs Tintri SecureVM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IronNet Collective Defense Platform and Tintri SecureVM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Views
763
Comparisons
238
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Buyer's Guide
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IronDefense, Iron Dome, Cyber Operations Center
Learn More
Overview

When organizations collaborate to detect, share intelligence, and stop threats together in real time, they form a Collective Defense community. Discover how IronNet's Collective Defense platform – built on our IronDome and IronDefense products – enables organizations to realize the full benefits of this approach.

The IronNet Collective Defense Platform leverages advanced AI-driven Network Detection and Response (NDR) capabilities to detect and prioritize anomalous activity inside individual enterprise network environments. The platform analyzes threat detections across the community to identify broad attack patterns and provides anonymized intelligence back to all community members in real time, giving all members early insight into potential incoming attacks. See Collective Defense in action.

Real-time Data Security with No Impact on Application Performance  

Security is top-of-mind for many organizations, especially in finance, government, defense and healthcare industries. There are often strict policy requirements or regulations to keep data secure at all times to protect against theft even during drive replacement or routine hardware maintenance.

Tintri’s SecureVM, provides the power to encrypt data at rest in real time, conforming to highest security standards to satisfy your toughest policy and regulatory requirements.

Sample Customers
Thomson Reuters
That’s why leading enterprises including Comcast, Chevron, NASA, Toyota, United Healthcare and 20% of the Fortune 100, trust Tintri with storage needs.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Financial Services Firm15%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 14th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while Tintri SecureVM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0, while Tintri SecureVM [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". On the other hand, IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x), whereas Tintri SecureVM [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.