Compare Redgate Data Masker vs. iScramble

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iScramble Logo
46 views|21 comparisons
Redgate Data Masker Logo
145 views|117 comparisons
Ranking
24th
out of 27 in Data Masking
Views
46
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
out of 27 in Data Masking
Views
145
Comparisons
117
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Delphix, Broadcom and others in Data Masking. Updated: September 2021.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Mentis
Video Not Available
Redgate
Video Not Available
Overview

iScramble is the MENTIS suiteā€™s solution for static data masking. iScramble allows you to apply a variety of masking methods to your data while maintaining referential integrity.

Data Masker can be used to mask data on any server that will run a SQL Server database. Data Masker is server neutral. It connects via the Microsoft supplied ADO software to the target database. The server side operating system is largely irrelevant to it.

Offer
Learn more about iScramble
Learn more about Redgate Data Masker
Sample Customers
Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agency
DBTA100
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Delphix, Broadcom and others in Data Masking. Updated: September 2021.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.

iScramble is ranked 24th in Data Masking while Redgate Data Masker is ranked 16th in Data Masking. iScramble is rated 0.0, while Redgate Data Masker is rated 0.0. On the other hand, iScramble is most compared with , whereas Redgate Data Masker is most compared with Delphix.

See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.