We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"The solution was scalable."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"The most valuable features of Kaseya VSA are remote control, live connect, and automation."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to offer control remotely to its users and provide patching capabilities to users."
"The product's support team is very quick to respond, especially because the tool's technical team operates in the same time zone where I am located."
"The most valuable feature of Kaseya VSA is the ability to control laptops remotely."
"This solution is our RMM tool and we love the deployment features."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"I have been looking for a way to deploy patches via the internet to selected equipment from Kaseya VSA, but it seems impossible."
"The reporting feature in Kaseya VSA could improve by being more user-friendly. The reporting overview is too wordy or the representation can be better."
"The agent-based monitoring solution can be improved."
"The product's user interface is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution is hard to use at first until you understand how it works."
"The deployment process could be better."
"The audit and KNM tools could improve."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Patch Management with 3 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 4th in Patch Management with 29 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is rated 8.0, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager writes "Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Ivanti Security Controls and GFI LanGuard, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.