We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"It is a very well-rounded product. It is a complete package with all the features using which we are able to manage our PCs very efficiently."
"I like its ease of use. It does what you need it to do, and it's a one-stop-shop for the company and for all your deployments. If you incorporate Intune into it, you can have both. You can bring your own devices and corporate devices, and everything runs out of SCCM and Intune."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"It does the job and meets our needs. With everybody working remotely these days, we are using this solution to deploy everything. The deployment of PCs is easy."
"There is a faster time to rollout. If we get a new PC, it can be ready for productivity right away."
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to learn."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"Marketing: Our management doesn't understand that there is a piece of software which helps them automate and manage the entire network, as far as operating systems on computers."
"It is not easy to get good technical support, especially at level one."
"Initial setup was complex. There's a lot that goes into it."
"The solution can be improved by speeding up the synchronizing of the policies on the devices."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"It is a bit of an old and outdated product."
"They need to improve the support for the Mac operating system."
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Patch Management with 3 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager writes "Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is most compared with Ivanti Security Controls and GFI LanGuard, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium. See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
