Anonymous UserSr. System Admin at a manufacturing company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur."
"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."
"This has made the management of our environment easier."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"I would like to see an agentless version of the solution."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool."
"The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made."
"We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"We have to pay for a license."
With Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, your enterprise can discover, assess, and remediate thousands of client systems comprehensively, consistently, and regularly, based on policies you define and without saturating your network or disrupting user productivity.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoints is ranked 9th in Patch Management with 1 review while SCCM is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 25 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Endpoints is rated 8.0, while SCCM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoints writes "Helps us detect vulnerabilities; provides clear visibility, suitable for small to medium size companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". Ivanti Patch for Endpoints is most compared with GFI LanGuard, Quest KACE Systems Management and Kaseya VSA, whereas SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and AWS Systems Manager.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.