Compare Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. SCCM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Quest Software and others in Patch Management. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is easy to implement."

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur.""This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system.""This has made the management of our environment easier.""This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD.""The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching.""The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.""Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching.""Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."

More SCCM Pros »

Cons
"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Cons »

"I would like to see an agentless version of the solution.""This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections.""Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell.""This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems.""The cost of the product can be improved.""The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool.""The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made.""We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."

More SCCM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.""Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose.""When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools.""Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing.""Presently, I am using a free trial version.""We have to pay for a license."

More SCCM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is easy to implement.
Top Answer: Compared to other software options, this is not exactly a cheap solution. However, the value you get is good, and therefore it's worth the cost.
Top Answer: The view of the security could be better. The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market.
Top Answer: I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution.
Top Answer: I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on. For this purpose, I am looking for another solution to perform more efficiently and to… more »
Ranking
16th
out of 22 in Patch Management
Views
165
Comparisons
85
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
347
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 22 in Patch Management
Views
45,578
Comparisons
29,294
Reviews
25
Average Words per Review
455
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HEAT Patch, PatchLink
System Center Configuration Manager
Learn More
Overview

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.
Offer
Learn more about Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
Learn more about SCCM
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company17%
Insurance Company11%
Transportation Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Quest Software and others in Patch Management. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is ranked 16th in Patch Management with 1 review while SCCM is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 25 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is rated 0.0, while SCCM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac writes "Easy to implement and offers good scanning but the pricing is a bit high". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is most compared with , whereas SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and AWS Systems Manager.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.