Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually.""We can set a maintenance window and push the patch.""The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications.""Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution.""I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature.""It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate.""We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.""The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pros →

"Software deployment and WSUS are most valuable.""Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable.""It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me.""Endpoint Manager is valuable to our organization because it allows us to connect to our enterprise from remote locations securely. The most useful feature is its robustness and scalability. It is highly scalable and flexible, allowing us to use it in various environments. Additionally, we can specialize the policies related to each device group. This ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours.""The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is the software deployment. Additionally, Microsoft integrates most of the other solutions well with one another.""It lets you know what your infrastructure is like and what state you are in.""It gives us the ability to set up schedules, according to what our security requirements are, to automate the patching of our servers and desktops."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pros →

Cons
"I would like to have better support for the application.""Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching.""I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high.""The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide.""The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable.""There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release.""Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions.""Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Cons →

"We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users.""On some hardware, we'd like an easier way to get peripherals attached.""The ability to integrate MDM would be great.""I would like to see an agentless version of the solution.""It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that.""With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff.""Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually.""I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
  • "The solution is expensive compared to other products."
  • "The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
  • More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."
  • "Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."
  • "Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."
  • "SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."
  • "The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
  • "Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
  • "When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
  • "Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
  • More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.
    Top Answer:There are some issues in the on-premises infrastructure of the clients.
    Top Answer:I provide the customer with the steps to follow, and they follow their scheduling and procedures. I also provide the information to the people involved in the pilot. My role is solely to provide a… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your… more »
    Top Answer:ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily and… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    2,988
    Comparisons
    1,877
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    8.0
    1st
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    7,053
    Comparisons
    5,408
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    458
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows
    Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
    Learn More
    Overview

    Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

    Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

    Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

    New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

    Sample Customers
    Presbyterian Church
    Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is ranked 8th in Patch Management with 10 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune writes "Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is most compared with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Quest KACE Systems Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, BigFix and Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Zabbix. See our Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.