We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Mocana vs. iWave Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iWave Security Logo
6 views|2 comparisons
Mocana Logo
105 views|74 comparisons
Ranking
18th
out of 18 in IoT Security
Views
6
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 18 in IoT Security
Views
105
Comparisons
74
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Mocana
Video Not Available
Overview

With the rise of connected devices and the potential of exposure to large attack surfaces through various wireless technologies, there is now a great need to implement security by design in embedded connected products. iWave has introduced a Security Solution to protect the billions of connected IoT devices, enabling them with security functions such as encryption, storage, data transmission, and certificate management. Also, iWave offers a Security Suite development kit, which is developed for different variants of NXP i.MX 8 and i.MX 6 high-performance applications processors.

Mocana unlocks the extended mobile enterprise and simplifies wide-scale deployments by securing apps automatically, in seconds. The company's Mobile Application Protection (MAP) app-shielding solution, distributed globally by SAP, mitigates the complexities of mobile management, while freeing developers from tedious and expensive security coding.

Offer
Learn more about iWave Security
Learn more about Mocana
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Talari, Avaya, GE, Schneider Electric

iWave Security is ranked 18th in IoT Security while Mocana is ranked 5th in IoT Security. iWave Security is rated 0.0, while Mocana is rated 0.0. On the other hand, iWave Security is most compared with , whereas Mocana is most compared with .

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.