Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Synopsys Defensics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Keysight Technologies Logo
187 views|148 comparisons
Synopsys Logo
197 views|121 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ixia BreakingPoint VE and Synopsys Defensics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Views
187
Comparisons
148
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 5 in Fuzz Testing Tools
Views
197
Comparisons
121
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Defensics, Codenomicon Defensics
Learn More
Overview

Ixia’s BreakingPoint virtual edition (VE) provides scalable real-world application and threat simulation in a deployment model that fits IT budgets by leveraging virtualization and industry-standard hardware platforms.

  • Seamless transition between hardware and virtual platforms enables easy translation of functional and performace testing in physical or virtual environments
  • Common licensing server shared among BreakingPoint VE, IxLoad VE, and IxNetwork VE
  • BreakingPoint supports all major Hypervisors allowing deployment in a wide variety of VM enviroments
  • Subscription based licensing model comes an all-inclusive license that reduces startup cost
  • Bi-monthly Application and Threat Intelligence (ATI) subscription updates ensure you are current with the latest applications and threats

Defensics® fuzz testing is a comprehensive, powerful, and automated black box solution that enables organizations to effectively and efficiently discover and remediate security weaknesses in software. By taking a systematic and intelligent approach to negative testing, Defensics allows organizations to ensure software security without compromising on product innovation, increasing time to market, or inflating operational costs.

Sample Customers
Corsa Technology
Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Financial Services Firm7%
University6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ixia BreakingPoint VE is ranked 36th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Synopsys Defensics is ranked 5th in Fuzz Testing Tools. Ixia BreakingPoint VE is rated 0.0, while Synopsys Defensics is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Synopsys Defensics writes "Technical support provided protocol-specific documentation to prove that some positives were not false". Ixia BreakingPoint VE is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood, whereas Synopsys Defensics is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Fortify on Demand, Invicti and HCL AppScan.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.