Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs WhiteHat Dynamic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Keysight Technologies Logo
187 views|148 comparisons
Synopsys Logo
113 views|85 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ixia BreakingPoint VE and WhiteHat Dynamic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
187
Comparisons
148
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
113
Comparisons
85
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
Learn More
Overview

Ixia’s BreakingPoint virtual edition (VE) provides scalable real-world application and threat simulation in a deployment model that fits IT budgets by leveraging virtualization and industry-standard hardware platforms.

  • Seamless transition between hardware and virtual platforms enables easy translation of functional and performace testing in physical or virtual environments
  • Common licensing server shared among BreakingPoint VE, IxLoad VE, and IxNetwork VE
  • BreakingPoint supports all major Hypervisors allowing deployment in a wide variety of VM enviroments
  • Subscription based licensing model comes an all-inclusive license that reduces startup cost
  • Bi-monthly Application and Threat Intelligence (ATI) subscription updates ensure you are current with the latest applications and threats

WhiteHat Dynamic™ enables organizations to test applications at DevSecOps speed and enterprise-scale to build trust into their entire software portfolio. WhiteHat Dynamic combines artificial intelligence with expert security analysis, producing verified, actionable findings with near-zero false positives and yielding the most accurate results enabling organizations the need to understand, prioritize, and mitigate or remediate vulnerabilities in the shortest timeframe.

Sample Customers
Corsa Technology
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Government11%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ixia BreakingPoint VE is ranked 36th in Application Security Testing (AST) while WhiteHat Dynamic is ranked 5th in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Ixia BreakingPoint VE is rated 0.0, while WhiteHat Dynamic is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhiteHat Dynamic writes "The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples". Ixia BreakingPoint VE is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood, whereas WhiteHat Dynamic is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.