Fortify Software Security Center vs Ixia BreakingPoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
376 views|303 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Keysight Technologies Logo
945 views|271 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and Ixia BreakingPoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have.""You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.""This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

More Fortify Software Security Center Pros →

"It is a scalable solution.""There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades.""The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks.""We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like.""I like that we can test cloud applications.""The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use.""The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

More Ixia BreakingPoint Pros →

Cons
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users.""Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful.""We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

More Fortify Software Security Center Cons →

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users.""I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks.""The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks.""The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do.""The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint.""The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined.""The price could be better."

More Ixia BreakingPoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."
  • "We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."
  • "or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."
  • "The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • More Ixia BreakingPoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks.
    Top Answer:The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint. The vendor should provide a portal for webinars.
    Ranking
    Views
    376
    Comparisons
    303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    945
    Comparisons
    271
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    304
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
    Learn More
    Overview
    Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

    By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
    Corsa Technology
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while Ixia BreakingPoint is ranked 23rd in Application Security Testing (AST) with 8 reviews. Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4, while Ixia BreakingPoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ixia BreakingPoint writes "Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions". Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Fortify on Demand, Tricentis Tosca and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Ixia BreakingPoint is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood and Synopsys Defensics.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.