• Home
  • Ixia BreakingPoint vs. WhiteHat Dynamic

Ixia BreakingPoint vs WhiteHat Dynamic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Keysight Technologies Logo

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews
945 views|271 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Synopsys Logo

WhiteHat Dynamic

Read 2 WhiteHat Dynamic reviews
113 views|85 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ixia BreakingPoint and WhiteHat Dynamic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Sai Prasad
Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions
Anonymous User
The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.
Using the Sentinel product allows our company to quickly identify any potential product vulnerabilities before they can be exploited with the... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."
  • "We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."
  • "or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."
  • "The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."

    • More Ixia BreakingPoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Ixia BreakingPoint?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ixia BreakingPoint?
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is expensive.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Ixia BreakingPoint?
    Top Answer:The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint. The vendor should provide a portal for webinars.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    945
    Comparisons
    271
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    304
    Rating
    8.5
    5th
    out of 12 in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    Views
    113
    Comparisons
    85
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
    Learn More
    Keysight Technologies
    Synopsys
    Overview

    By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

    WhiteHat Dynamic™ enables organizations to test applications at DevSecOps speed and enterprise-scale to build trust into their entire software portfolio. WhiteHat Dynamic combines artificial intelligence with expert security analysis, producing verified, actionable findings with near-zero false positives and yielding the most accurate results enabling organizations the need to understand, prioritize, and mitigate or remediate vulnerabilities in the shortest timeframe.

    Sample Customers
    Corsa Technology
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ixia BreakingPoint is ranked 23rd in Application Security Testing (AST) with 8 reviews while WhiteHat Dynamic is ranked 5th in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Ixia BreakingPoint is rated 8.4, while WhiteHat Dynamic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ixia BreakingPoint writes "Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhiteHat Dynamic writes "The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples". Ixia BreakingPoint is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood and Synopsys Defensics, whereas WhiteHat Dynamic is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.