Compare Jama Connect vs. PTC Integrity

Jama Connect is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 3 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 7.0, while PTC Integrity is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". Jama Connect is most compared with JIRA, IBM Rational DOORS and Polarion Requirements, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS. See our Jama Connect vs. PTC Integrity report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jama Connect Logo
4,300 views|3,550 comparisons
PTC Integrity Logo
1,992 views|1,454 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.Complete traceability as per process requirements.We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.

Read more »

Cons
I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved.t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information.Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects.

Read more »

We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,300
Comparisons
3,550
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
1,992
Comparisons
1,454
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
423
Avg. Rating
6.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
MKS
Learn
Jama
PTC
Overview
Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about Jama Connect
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft UniversityTRW Automotive
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Manufacturing Company21%
Comms Service Provider9%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company50%
Manufacturing Company25%
Engineering Company13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Transportation Company17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Comms Service Provider9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.