Ilia ChtcherbakovJefe Area Middleware at Servicio de Impuestos Internos
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"The solution is much lighter as an application server than other solutions that we used before. We used IBM Workshare Application Server and Oracle WebLogic. They are heavy application servers. JBoss is lighter. It starts faster and iterates its application fast. It's much, much faster than the competition."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"The speed of development is the quickest for any tool on the market."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"IBM offered JAVA profiling, which is something I used often and I wish that JBoss had something similar."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"The user interface could be improved to be more friendly for developers."
"The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime."
Earn 20 points
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Magic xpa Application Platform is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 1 review. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 8.4, while Magic xpa Application Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Light, with an easy initial setup and a good set of features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Magic xpa Application Platform writes "Mature solution that can be used on any platform and most databases are supported by it automatically". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus and Oracle SOA Suite, whereas Magic xpa Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, OutSystems, Apache Web Server, Microsoft Azure App Service and Xamarin Platform.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.