We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"The solution is easy to use if the user is a developer or some technical person."
"The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"In-built refactoring and .Net profilers are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"Lacking in auto-scaling."
"In the realm of Microsoft .NET Framework, particularly in the C# language, there have been significant developments that I find highly commendable. I am genuinely fascinated by the continuous evolution of the language, and staying abreast of the latest features in Azure is both challenging and enjoyable. Working with C# in Azure is particularly fantastic. I appreciate in .NET, as compared to Java, is the enforcement of types, providing a better experience in terms of technicalities. Additionally, the introduction of Roslyn in the past few years has brought about the concept of late .NET, which I find interesting and powerful. This allows for the transformation of symbolic code just before execution, eliminating the runtime decision-making process and enhancing efficiency. However, late .NET does come with a drawback – a delay in the last-minute computation when starting an executable. While some may find this less appealing in terms of instant responsiveness, especially in serverless cloud environments, the efficiency gained from executing strictly binary code is valuable. Despite potential drawbacks like the time required for activation, I view .NET favorably for its technical advancements and efficiency, especially in scenarios such as serverless cloud computing. It's essential to recognize the intricacies of how .NET processes code and the efficiency it brings, which some may overlook."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.