Ilia ChtcherbakovJefe Area Middleware at Servicio de Impuestos Internos
AndreasSemousuProject Delivery Manager at Skhomo Technologies
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"The solution is much lighter as an application server than other solutions that we used before. We used IBM Workshare Application Server and Oracle WebLogic. They are heavy application servers. JBoss is lighter. It starts faster and iterates its application fast. It's much, much faster than the competition."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"IBM offered JAVA profiling, which is something I used often and I wish that JBoss had something similar."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"The product and support for this solution are free for everyone."
"The pricing could be cheaper."
"There is a Community Edition that can be used free of charge, but the licensing cost for the Enterprise version is quite high."
"If you want to develop an enterprise-level application, you have to purchase the enterprise-level development license."
"The Microsoft .NET Framework is free of charge, without licensing cost."
"For the moment I can only give the product a rating of five out of ten since only some of the customers will be satisfied, those that have the financial resources for hosting a platform on Windows Server."
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 13 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 8.4, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Light, with an easy initial setup and a good set of features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Has improved our efficiency in the time it takes to program a solution". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, NGINX Plus, Oracle SOA Suite and Azul Zulu, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, IBM BPM and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.