Compare JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.""The solution is much lighter as an application server than other solutions that we used before. We used IBM Workshare Application Server and Oracle WebLogic. They are heavy application servers. JBoss is lighter. It starts faster and iterates its application fast. It's much, much faster than the competition.""Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pros »

"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily.""The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager.""The most valuable feature is the financial accounting.""When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use.""The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process.""As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others.""I'd rate the solution as highly stable.""Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."

More Microsoft .NET Framework Pros »

Cons
"This solution needs better management UI.""IBM offered JAVA profiling, which is something I used often and I wish that JBoss had something similar.""Lacks some functional requirements."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Cons »

"It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux.""Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement.""This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools.""They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers.""If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful.""In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients.""The pricing is a bit expensive.""The .NET open source community could be larger."

More Microsoft .NET Framework Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The product and support for this solution are free for everyone.""The pricing could be cheaper.""There is a Community Edition that can be used free of charge, but the licensing cost for the Enterprise version is quite high.""If you want to develop an enterprise-level application, you have to purchase the enterprise-level development license.""The Microsoft .NET Framework is free of charge, without licensing cost.""For the moment I can only give the product a rating of five out of ten since only some of the customers will be satisfied, those that have the financial resources for hosting a platform on Windows Server."

More Microsoft .NET Framework Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is much lighter as an application server than other solutions that we used before. We used IBM Workshare Application Server and Oracle WebLogic. They are heavy application servers. JBoss… more »
Top Answer: I might not be the best person to discuss what features are missing as I am only a developer. I rely on the connection point mechanics, thread pulling mechanics. That's as far as I go. In terms of… more »
Top Answer: JBoss has less maintenance costs than, for example, IBM.
Top Answer: If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET.
Top Answer: You need to have the technical expertise to use this product.
Top Answer: We are using this solution for Forms. Website for basic monitoring of the tools, and we have developed intelligent automation which is like a service and is running in the backend to monitor bots. We… more »
Ranking
Views
1,196
Comparisons
989
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
505
Rating
8.3
Views
3,169
Comparisons
1,545
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
653
Rating
8.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
MS .NET Framework
Learn More
Overview
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
.NET Framework is a software framework that runs primarily on Microsoft Windows. It includes a large class library named Framework Class Library (FCL) and provides language interoperability across several programming languages. Programs written for .NET Framework execute in a software environment named Common Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual machine that provides services such as security, memory management, and exception handling. FCL and CLR together constitute .NET Framework.
Offer
Learn more about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Learn more about Microsoft .NET Framework
Sample Customers
APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Government25%
University13%
Mining And Metals Company13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm6%
Educational Organization5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise35%
Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 13 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 8.4, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Light, with an easy initial setup and a good set of features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Has improved our efficiency in the time it takes to program a solution". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, NGINX Plus, Oracle SOA Suite and Azul Zulu, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, IBM BPM and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.