Compare JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Oracle SOA Suite

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.""The solution is much lighter as an application server than other solutions that we used before. We used IBM Workshare Application Server and Oracle WebLogic. They are heavy application servers. JBoss is lighter. It starts faster and iterates its application fast. It's much, much faster than the competition."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time.""The ability to stand up a highly available SOA Suite, which has full DR capabilities, in a remote center and synchronize the databases using Data Guard.""We were able to scale out using multiple application and web servers balanced by hardware load balancers and Weblogic clustering."

More Oracle SOA Suite Pros »

Cons
"This solution needs better management UI.""IBM offered JAVA profiling, which is something I used often and I wish that JBoss had something similar."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Cons »

"If the disk space expansion can be made more flexible, not requiring a database restart, it would be a major benefit.""Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."

More Oracle SOA Suite Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."

More Oracle SOA Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:  If you have a limited budget and you want to use Oracle SOA Suite, and your company does not have an agreement with Oracle forget it. Budget aside, Oracle SOA suite price fit enterprise and large… more »
Ranking
Views
800
Comparisons
702
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
92
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
4,553
Comparisons
2,198
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
438
Avg. Rating
9.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAPSOA Suite
Learn
Red Hat
Oracle
Overview
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Oracle SOA Suite is a comprehensive, standards-based software suite to build, deploy and manage integration following the concepts of service-oriented architecture (SOA). The components of the suite benefit from consistent tooling, a single deployment and management model, end-to-end security and unified metadata management. Oracle SOA Suite helps businesses lower costs by allowing maximum re-use of existing IT investments and assets, regardless of the environment (OS, application server, etc.) they run in, or the technology they were built upon. Its easy-to-use, re-use focused, unified application development tooling and end-to-end lifecycle management support further reduces development and maintenance cost and complexity.

For more information on Oracle SOA Suite, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Learn more about Oracle SOA Suite
Sample Customers
APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Non Tech Company8%
Healthcare Company8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 8.6, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Light, with an easy initial setup and a good set of features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "It is perfect for large deployments and integrating with other Oracle solutions. ". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and Zend PHP Engine, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with WebLogic Suite, Mule ESB, SAP NetWeaver, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and IBM BPM.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.