We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
