We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."
"The stability has been good."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."
"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."
"The initial setup process is quite straightforward."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
"What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users."
"I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process."
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". JBoss ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
