Compare JBoss ESB vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use JBoss ESB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, IBM, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."

More JBoss ESB Pros »

"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.""A product with good API and EDI components.""All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas.""One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations.""Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."

More JBoss ESB Cons »

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.""The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.""The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.""The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.""The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.""Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.""The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.""It's a good deal for the money that we pay.""Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Yes, you can. The tech product will stay the same, what you need is to become an ISV (Independent Software vendor) Partner in the Oracle Partner Program, and negotiate an ESL (Embedded Software… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
12th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
1,095
Comparisons
891
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
639
Rating
7.0
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
17,164
Comparisons
11,830
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
749
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
Red Hat
Software AG
Overview
JBossESB is the next generation of EAI - better and without the vendor-lockin characteristics of old. As such, many of the capabilities mirror those of existing EAI offerings: Business Process Monitoring, Integrated Development Environment, Human Workflow User Interface, Business Process Management, Connectors, Transaction Manager, Security, Application Container, Messaging Service, Metadata Repository, Naming and Directory Service, Distributed Computing Architecture. Plus JBossESB is part of an SOI (Service Oriented Infrastructure). However, SOA is not simply a technology or a product: it's a style of design, with many aspects (such as architectural, methodological and organisational) unrelated to the actual technology.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about JBoss ESB
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Rancore, Sprint, ResMed, Brazil's Ministry of Health, ING Services PolskaFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider36%
Computer Software Company32%
Manufacturing Company5%
Insurance Company4%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Manufacturing Company19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Retailer7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Large Enterprise85%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, IBM, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JBoss ESB is ranked 12th in ESB with 1 review while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 9 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex". JBoss ESB is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, SAP Process Orchestration and IBM WebSphere Message Broker.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.