We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle Fusion Middleware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The high availability is great."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The solution's support is very good for repairing components."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable thing about JBoss is how easy it is to install and manage it on-premise, making the process simple."
"JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications."
"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"The most valuable feature is the structure of the product. We use Oracle Fusion Middleware to manage the Oracle database. Registered users can go to each product if sign-on credentials match each user's identical framework."
"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."
"Data integrity."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"The stability of the solution could improve with Microsoft Windows."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Sometimes the console has a glitch."
"The login process could be improved."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."
"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"The product should improve BPEL features."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"One thing that I would like to see is if this product can be containerized. We are moving away from virtual servers and moving more towards containerization to be able to quickly set up environments or have the flexibility of scaling them. It would be good if it can be containerized, and it works well in containerized platforms."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 21 reviews while Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and Caucho Resin, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and TIBCO ActiveMatrix. See our JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.