JBoss vs Oracle WebLogic Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
5,550 views|4,782 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
8,361 views|7,375 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers.""JBoss is a scalable tool.""We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config.""The solution's support is very good for repairing components.""The most valuable feature is the UI.""The product integrates well with Java applications.""The high availability is great.""The support is fast and reliable."

More JBoss Pros →

"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand.""Oracle WebLogic Server is secure.""Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient.""It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers.""The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments.""In WebLogic, the most useful feature is the UI administration console from where we can configure everything, such as security access, and we can start and stop it graphically. That's the best feature of WebLogic Server.""The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service.""The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Pros →

Cons
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement.""The solution's documentation could be better.""In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it.""Logging-related issues in JBoss require improvement.""The solution could improve by providing more integration.""The product could be cheaper.""The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them.""The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."

More JBoss Cons →

"Licensing fees need improvement.""They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature.""There's a bug related to the managed services.""I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched.""If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge.""Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution.""The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved.""The cost could always be lower."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."
  • "The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."
  • "Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."
  • "Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • "There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."
  • "JBoss is an expensive solution."
  • "The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."
  • More JBoss Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."
  • "In our country, this is an expensive product."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I would not compare WebSphere and WebLogic because both servers are really good. The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
  • "Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing is high-priced."
  • "The tool's pricing is yearly."
  • More Oracle WebLogic Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic.
    Top Answer:The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it… more »
    Top Answer:Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient.
    Top Answer:Identifying threats, especially when using Oracle WebLogic with connection pooling on an Oracle database, can be somewhat confusing. Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level… more »
    Top Answer:We use it for developing, deploying, and managing enterprise-level Java-based applications.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 20 in Application Server
    Views
    5,550
    Comparisons
    4,782
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    8.5
    1st
    out of 20 in Application Server
    Views
    8,361
    Comparisons
    7,375
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    449
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebLogic Application Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), a market-leading, fully certified Java EE platform, gives you a single platform to quickly develop and deploy applications. Use traditional Red Hat JBoss EAP to gain business agility with your existing applications and reduce the costs of proprietary platforms.

    Oracle WebLogic Server 12c, the world’s first cloud-native, enterprise Java platform enables you to fully realize the benefits of cloud computing. Unique multitenancy capability drives massive consolidation. Lightweight microcontainer architecture drives application isolation and 100 percent portability between your private and public cloud. Multi data center high availability architecture protects against application disruption. Developer innovations with full Java EE 7 and Java SE8 support maximize DevOps productivity. Additionally, you continue to have access to the same platform on premises and in the cloud, via Oracle Java Cloud Service, which is based on Oracle WebLogic Server.

    For more information on Oracle Weblogic Server, visit Oracle.com

    Sample Customers
    Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE
    Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company53%
    Transportation Company12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Government17%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Media Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 23 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 31 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Robust Java EE application server capabilities providing excellent stability and management features, but it comes with a potential downside of high licensing costs and a steeper learning curve". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.

    See our list of best Application Server vendors.

    We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.