JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management vs Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management.
Featured Review
Use Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
Top Answer:I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
200
Comparisons
169
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
355
Rating
8.0
Views
78
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
MAPCON Professional, MAPCON PRO
Learn More
Overview
Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management solution helps drive greater value from your assets, whether they are plants, facilities, or equipment. From capital planning and budgeting, to procurement and operations, to maintenance and repair. Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Capital Asset Management provides you with complete visibility into your assets. It gives you the information you need to make the financial and operational decisions that optimize equipment performance from deployment through operations, maintenance, and retirement. Capital Asset Management is fully integrated with other key JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including those that support the management of human capital, finances, procurement, projects, and services and warranties.
Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Advanced (PRO) CMMS Software can support Project Management, manage Safety Procedures, engage in Work Order Planning and utilize ISO, QS and JCO Audit Controls.
Sample Customers
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Red Star Yeast, PHS/ MWA Aviation Services, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Michigan State University, Didion Milling, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, Tucson Unified School District, West Des Moines Community School District, Schaumberg School District #54, City of Omaha, Golden Triangle Energy
Buyer's Guide
IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews while Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional is ranked 21st in Enterprise Asset Management. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0, while Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". On the other hand, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with IBM Maximo, whereas Mapcon Technologies MAPCON Professional is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.