We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I think JDE ERP is very flexible and very convenient for the users. I think EnterpriseOne is more convenient for users to do the inquiry and do the data entry. The UI is better than JDE World. For JDE products, including the World version, is very flexible. It's a good product for clients."
"The most valuable feature is that it works according to how the Internet works."
"I would say that the solution is highly configurable."
"The project management aspect and the timesheets are valuable, especially for ensuring that our milestone billings are automated properly. From a manufacturing perspective, it is more to do with the entire management of the inventory, the overall finance, consolidation of books of accounts, and managing the profit and loss in a more effective manner."
"It's integrated into everything well so you can navigate and use it in a very simple way."
"I have found there to be many features, such as manufacturing, accounting, financials, inventory, and purchasing."
"The user interface is very good."
"NetSuite ERP is good for a trading company that involves buying and selling."
"The most valuable feature in NetSuite ERP is the user interface."
"I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE."
"It would be great if they offered localization for Central America."
"What needs to be improved is the development in the other areas and other businesses that can use NetSuite."
"In terms of the main improvement to NetSuite is the talent itself. It's grown so fast and there are about 25,000 companies running on it, and it's a relatively newer system compared to other competitors. It's growing so fast that the talent base in the partner organization (there's about 200 of them), is pretty thin."
"Some of the features around the payroll and payroll taxes and management of that are lacking. We had to outsource some of that because we found that the functionality isn't there."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. Multiple manufacturing features need to be updated on NetSuite. More functionalities need to be added. I think there are a lot of functionalities coming out for warehouse management systems and manufacturing automation via advanced manufacturing functionalities. I think they need to improve a little more on those aspects and make it easier on the scheduling aspect."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The solution is not user-friendly and it is complex to use."
"If you do go through an implementor, you need to be careful that they are actual implementors and not just resellers."
"There is an annual license required to use this solution."
"The price of the solution is quite high."
"It is completely on a subscription basis. We pay yearly and, and you do not have to do anything on a monthly basis. Prices depend on the organization's scale and all those things, but they are doing a good job with the pricing."
"When people buy ERP, it's a competitive situation and the pricing is paramount."
Earn 20 points
JD Edwards World is ranked 14th in ERP with 1 review while NetSuite ERP is ranked 1st in Cloud ERP with 8 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 8.0, while NetSuite ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "Convenient and flexible for users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite ERP writes "Carries a broad range of applications, specifically in the field services area". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, NetSuite OneWorld and SAP S4HANA, whereas NetSuite ERP is most compared with Oracle ERP Cloud, SAP S4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S4HANA Cloud.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.