Compare JD Edwards World vs. PeopleSoft

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JD Edwards World Logo
1,799 views|1,608 comparisons
PeopleSoft Logo
9,884 views|8,210 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use JD Edwards World? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, IFS and others in ERP. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I think JDE ERP is very flexible and very convenient for the users. I think EnterpriseOne is more convenient for users to do the inquiry and do the data entry. The UI is better than JDE World. For JDE products, including the World version, is very flexible. It's a good product for clients."

More JD Edwards World Pros »

"I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution.""The solution's scalability is good.""Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market.""The new version of this solution is very scalable.""The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements.""PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus.""In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do.""The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."

More PeopleSoft Pros »

Cons
"I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE."

More JD Edwards World Cons »

"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment.""The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this.""If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive.""There could be more adaptability of the system.""Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors.""It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports.""I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it.""Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."

More PeopleSoft Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It's approximately $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 USD per year.""The licensing cost for PeopleSoft is 3,500 per course and the annual subscription fee is 6,500.""I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspending licenses.""There are no additional costs for licensing."

More PeopleSoft Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I have compared some with Oracle Fusion and all have their pluses and minuses. Workday was too complex for a company to maintain. They replaced PeopleSoft (old version) by Oracle Fusion because… more »
Top Answer: In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more… more »
Top Answer: I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or Good Receipt note, which is the time that the materials come in, and the workdays, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through… more »
Ranking
12th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
1,799
Comparisons
1,608
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
461
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
out of 54 in ERP
Views
9,884
Comparisons
8,210
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
484
Avg. Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Learn
Oracle
Oracle
Overview
Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.
Offer
Learn more about JD Edwards World
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Sample Customers
SICIM S.p.A., Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A, Atrium European Real Estate, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Calumet Specialty Partners, LP Products, Grupo Arcor, Original BUFF S.A., Shelf Drilling Ltd., African + Eastern, Westfield Group LLC, Sportmaster Ltd., Beijing Xinladao Restaurant GroupBMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider7%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
University12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government9%
Local Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, IFS and others in ERP. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JD Edwards World is ranked 12th in ERP with 1 review while PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in ERP with 12 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 8.0, while PeopleSoft is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "Convenient and flexible for users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "User-friendly and performs well but views should be simplified to one page". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP S4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and NetSuite OneWorld, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Oracle E-Business Suite, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle ERP Cloud.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.