Compare Jenkins vs. TeamCity

Jenkins is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 12 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 3 reviews. Jenkins is rated 8.0, while TeamCity is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Jenkins writes "Significantly reduces build times, automates frequent manual tasks, reduces errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "The flexibility of the product allows it to support a seemingly infinite number of build workflows". Jenkins is most compared with TeamCity, GoCD and IBM Rational Build Forge, whereas TeamCity is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab and Bamboo. See our Jenkins vs. TeamCity report.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jenkins Logo
13,635 views|10,901 comparisons
TeamCity Logo
5,156 views|4,017 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for.The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle.This solution has helped us in automating the build and test process, reducing time.It is very useful for us to be able to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines.The most valuable feature is its ability to connect with different tools and technologies.There are a large number of plugins available for integration with third party systems.Having builds and test tasks triggered on commit helps not to break the product.We significantly reduced build times of large projects (more than 80k lines of Scala code) using build time on Jenkins as a time sample. It reduced the developer write-test-commit cycle time, and increased productivity.

Read more »

I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine.It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack.Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end.

Read more »

I think an integrated help button, that respected the context of the change/work in hand, would be a worthwhile improvement.Better and easy-to-use integration with Docker would be an improvement.The upgrades need improvement.The learning curve is quite steep at the moment.This solution would be improved with the inclusion of an Artifactory (Universal artifact repository manager).The user interface could be updated a little.Jenkins relies on the old version of interface for configuration management. This needs improvement.Developer documentation for plugins, plugin development, integrations: Sometimes it’s tricky to do pretty obvious things.

Read more »

Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there.Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Jenkins is open source and free.I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs.Some of the add-ons are too expensive.It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good.​It is free.​

Read more »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparison Review
Michelle XIE
out of 25 in Build Automation
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
out of 25 in Build Automation
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

Learn more about Jenkins
Learn more about TeamCity
Sample Customers
Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzboxToyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Top Industries
Software R&D Company40%
Media Company20%
Financial Services Firm20%
Marketing Services Firm10%
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm25%
Media Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email