JenniferSoft vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JenniferSoft Logo
241 views|164 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
579 views|389 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JenniferSoft and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The dashboard is a valuable feature."

More JenniferSoft Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out.""The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects.""For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."

More OpenText Diagnostics Pros →

Cons
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."

More JenniferSoft Cons →

"The interface could be more user friendly.""The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI.""The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

More OpenText Diagnostics Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The dashboard is a valuable feature.
Top Answer:The solution is pricy and has room for improvement.
Top Answer:I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
241
Comparisons
164
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Views
579
Comparisons
389
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Overview

JenniferSoft Application Performance Management (APM) is a system management methodology that focuses on monitoring and managing application software performance and service utilization. Also, it is a tool that helps system availability and stable operation by monitoring and analyzing performance of operating systems. JENNIFER provides comprehensive and integrated performance monitoring through its many dashboard views, which include Real-user Monitoring and Real-time Topology. JENNIFER analyzes statistical data regarding system resources, application performance and errors with a view to achieving continuous and optimal service availability. JENNIFER's continuous monitoring helps with rapid detection and troubleshooting of performance problems. That can help prevent the problems from affecting service availability later. And minimizing system downtime and improving overall performance at the application and system levels greatly improves customer satisfaction.

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. JenniferSoft is rated 8.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana, whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Accedian Skylight.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.