We performed a comparison between JenniferSoft and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage the application flow."
"We appreciate the way that this solution allows us to monitor the ongoing status of the UI at any given time."
"The solution is quite stable."
"They instrument up from the bottom to the top – every piece of code - they have a very perfect read of what’s being done, and how long it’s taking."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"It has the ability to monitor random URLs not tied to the one pinger per application (though it costs extra)."
"The alert mechanism is quite accurate when something goes wrong in your system. For example, if you have hundreds of APIs on your server, and any of the APIs is not performing well, you get an alert. When there is a drop or change in the threshold value, the beauty of New Relic is that within a fraction of seconds, all the stakeholders who are configured in the New Relic system will get an alert. That's one good thing."
"It gives insights to non-technical people about what technical issues are most important, how much it impacts customers, and potentially, where we should be targeting our development teams when they have time."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"I would like if it could have predictive analysis. Today, we only have the option to configure thresholds."
"The product has good documentation for Linux, however, their documentation for Windows is lacking substantially. It's something they need to develop."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."
"The price could improve."
"The APIs could be better. I would also like more APIs and features to integrate with streaming solutions, like Kinesis or Kafka."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 151 reviews. JenniferSoft is rated 8.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.