Compare JIRA Portfolio vs. LiquidPlanner

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Planview LeanKit Logo
738 views|345 comparisons
JIRA Portfolio Logo
3,089 views|1,962 comparisons
LiquidPlanner Logo
393 views|212 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, GitLab and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It makes work visible, so everybody knows where everything is. It uses Kanban, and that makes work visible.""We use the board and card hierarchies in terms of sprints so that we can see if we have cross-functional teams that are working on the same projects together, especially when projects have dependencies. The parent-child relationship within cards is really nice so that we can see what kind of dependencies there are when we're trying to get projects finished.""My team specifically uses our board for all of our Remedy tickets that come in. We had a card for every ticket that we get, and we're able to add the link to that specific ticket there.If I'm out of office, for example, and someone else needs to work a ticket or someone is being contacted to work on a ticket, I don't have to sign on it. Someone else can easily access that ticket because I put the link in there. It's nice. It has a lot of great functionality in there.""Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner. It is highly collaborative; everybody can see things in one place. It is a highly functional, but pretty simple tool. That is hard to find: A tool that has a lot of functions, but is also simple."

More Planview LeanKit Pros »

"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good.""With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things.""The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized.""The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use.""The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled.""The product makes it easy to collaborate even though it can use some improvement in that area.""The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering.""The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."

More JIRA Portfolio Pros »

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

More LiquidPlanner Pros »

Cons
"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum. Maybe it has that functionality. I have never tried to set it up. You think of LeanKit from the perspective of Kanban. I don't know if there is a template for scrum, a scaled agile framework, or any of those scaling frameworks.""Being able to track actual time on cards or sprints, instead of using just the planned start and stop date, would also be useful. I would like to see something like JIRA has with actual sprint starts and stops.""The ability to report on customizable fields and third-party extensions needs improvement. I'd like to see more of those being able to be used. I don't know how that works for Planview, but just getting a little bit more added there would be nice.""The integration with the Enterprise One product is probably an area for improvement. It's not really broken. It's just that it is such a handy tool and a great way to visually manage things. There is a very limited hookup/integration between Enterprise One, which is the master Planview tool, and LeanKit. While they are looking at this on their roadmap, it definitely needs to happen. There is a lot of opportunity there."

More Planview LeanKit Cons »

"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out.""This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing.""I think that front-end development is a little bit buggy in some cases. Some of the features take a while to respond and some need to be more clear.""The initial setup could use improvement.""The product could do with more flexible reporting.""Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work.""The workflow needs improvement.""I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."

More JIRA Portfolio Cons »

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

More LiquidPlanner Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get."

More Planview LeanKit Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing of the solution is expensive.""We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher.""The pricing continues to get higher.""The product is really not very expensive.""We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."

More JIRA Portfolio Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner. It is highly collaborative; everybody… more »
Top Answer: The integration with the Enterprise One product is probably an area for improvement. It's not really broken. It's just… more »
Top Answer: We have a unique use case. Normally, people use LeanKit to track agile development in IT. However, we use the product to… more »
Top Answer: The feature that we like the most is that JIRA enables modules. Atlassian provides a lot of products around JIRA,… more »
Top Answer: We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available.
Top Answer: We would love to be able to have direct contact with Atlassian. Currently, they are not working directly with West… more »
Top Answer: It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a… more »
Top Answer: We use LiquidPlanner for managing our projects. It is a web-based solution that uses single sign-on and is accessible… more »
Top Answer: Using LiquidPlanner requires a change in the way an organization sees project management. A project manager can't really… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
LeanKit
Portfolio for JIRA
Learn More
Overview

Planview LeanKit enables engineering teams across all levels of the organization with a visual work delivery tool to apply Lean management principles to their work, helping them work smarter and deliver faster.

The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.

With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.

LiquidPlanner is predictive, online project management for modern business. Our software enables people, teams and business leaders to plan, manage, collaborate and report on single projects, or an entire portfolio of projects, in real-time. LiquidPlanner’s award-winning and patent-pending predictive scheduling engine calculates project completion dates automatically based on three key factors; priority of work, the effort needed to compete the work, and resource availability. The LiquidPlanner scheduling engine uses this information in conjunction with sophisticated risk assessment modeling to accurately predict when work will be completed with 98 percent accuracy.

For more details visit our website
Offer
Learn more about Planview LeanKit
Learn more about JIRA Portfolio
Learn more about LiquidPlanner
Sample Customers
REA Group, Thompson Reuters
Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm7%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, GitLab and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 13 reviews while LiquidPlanner is ranked 13th in Project Management Software with 2 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.8, while LiquidPlanner is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Not a calendaring program . It focuses on listing tasks, simplifying collaboration, and Getting Things Done". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Smartsheet, Planview PPM Pro and Trello, whereas LiquidPlanner is most compared with Microsoft Project Server.

See our list of .

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.