We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and LiquidPlanner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work."
"I think the solution's most important and valuable feature is its ability to track the issues."
"The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled."
"The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio is the visuals it provides rather than Kanban boarded tickets."
"I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely."
"Portfolio's best feature is integration with other JIRA products."
"The solution is very powerful and the underlying structure of it is well done. The company behind the solution is very open as far as their whole ecosystem is concerned. They also do a lot of work in the training area."
"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"The solution’s pricing could be reduced."
"Requires some effort to insert functionalities and that could be simplified."
"JIRA and Confluence must be linked automatically."
"The solution's look and feel could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly."
"Our major team does not control or manage JIRA server well since sometimes there is trouble using the solution, which is a problem. The solution's speed needs to be improved."
"We are based in India; I would like the product to integrate local pricing. We earn in rupees but spend in dollars. Its pricing could also be lowered."
"Portfolio is easy to scale, but we've had some difficulties with it regarding compliance and support."
"It's got kind of a steep learning curve."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
Earn 20 points
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while LiquidPlanner is ranked 35th in Project Management Software. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while LiquidPlanner is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas LiquidPlanner is most compared with . See our JIRA Portfolio vs. LiquidPlanner report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
